Wolf pack that attacked Colorado livestock to be relocated as reintroduction program stumbles (2024)

By MATTHEW BROWN - Associated Press

Wildlife agencies are trying to capture and relocate the first pack of wolves that formed under Colorado's ambitious wolf reintroduction program after the animals repeatedly attacked livestock, marking an early stumble in the voter-driven initiative.

The move comes only a week after state officials touted three pups born to the Copper Creek pack, which formed after 10 of the predators from Oregon were released in December over bitter opposition from livestock groups. The pack has at least two adults.

The bid to capture them goes against Colorado's wolf management plan that was adopted last year. It included guidance that relocation “has little technical merit” because it could create problems elsewhere if the animals continue attacking livestock. The plan calls for using non-lethal approaches, such as patrolling ranches with range riders and scaring away problem wolves, or killing them if necessary to stop ongoing attacks on livestock.

People are also reading…

Officials did not say where the Copper Creek pack would be relocated, nor whether they would be released into the wild or kept in captivity.

Ranching groups had wanted the wolf pack killed. Wildlife advocates said more should have been done to keep them from killing livestock, such as using electric fencing that can better deters attacks.

In other parts of the U.S. where wolves are well-established — including in the Northern U.S. Rocky Mountains and around the Great Lakes — the predators are routinely killed by wildlife officials in response to livestock attacks. Wolves are prolific breeders so removing some animals doesn't have population-wide effects.

Colorado's attempt to instead capture problem wolves comes after an agency spokesperson told The Associated Press last week that officials wanted to avoid killing them because “it's too early in the process” of reintroduction.

“We don't have enough wolves on the landscape to lethally remove” the pack, spokesperson Travis Duncan said.

State officials did not disclose where the capture operations were taking place but said the work was being done with help from federal officials and under U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service rules. More details will be released after the relocation is completed, Duncan said Wednesday.

Michael Saul with Defenders of Wildlife said it was a “big setback” for the reintroduction.

“There are lots of ranchers using existing tools who are living with wolves and not having this problem,” Saul said. “Even if the individual wolves survived, taking them out of the wild is removing the one successful breeding pack for Colorado.”

Saul said he was concerned the pups might not survive the capture operations and that the two adult wolves might not be released. That would be contrary to the voter-approved plan to reintroduce the animals to the wild, he said.

Rancher Ted Ritschard, who lives about 15 miles (24 kilometers) from the ranch in Grand County, Colorado, where most of the livestock attacks took place, said he was glad the pack would be removed. He blamed them for killing at least 16 cattle and sheep and wants them in captivity so they don't kill again.

“These pups have learned to kill livestock so they're going to keep doing it,” said Ritschard, president of the Middle Park Stockgrowers Association. “Once they get a taste of sheep or cattle, that’s a whole different world."

Ritschard said area ranchers sought permission earlier this year to kill the wolves that were causing problems but were denied. The state's denial notice said livestock attacks had decreased when a rancher in the area buried a “dead pit” used to dispose of dead animals that was suspected of attracting wolves.

Ritschard refuted the claim that the dead pit played a role in the attacks.

“We would see the wolves go by that dead pit at night. There was nothing fresh in that dead pit,” he said.

In a statement issued late Tuesday, Colorado Parks and Wildlife Director Jeff Davis characterized the Copper Creek pack relocation as a “unique case,” but did not elaborate.

“This action is by no means a precedent for how CPW will resolve wolf-livestock conflict moving forward,” Davis said in the statement. He said the goal was to relocate the pack “while we assess our best options for them.”

Wolf reintroduction in Colorado was narrowly approved by voters in a 2020 ballot measure. Wildlife officials expect to release an additional 30 to 50 wolves over the coming years. A handful of wolves have also wandered into Colorado from Wyoming.

Proponents argued that the apex predators would reestablish an ecological balance in the area. Wolves were largely hunted out of the state by the 1940s.

Owners of calves that are killed can be compensated by the state for the animal’s market value, up to $15,000. Ranchers have said that's not enough.

Gray wolves killed some 800 domesticated animals across 10 states in 2022, including Colorado, according to a previous Associated Press review of depredation data from state and federal agencies.

While the losses can affect individual ranchers, it has a negligible effect on the industry at large. Ranchers say many additional kills go unrecorded because the dead livestock is never found or the cause of death can’t be confirmed.

Copyright 2024 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

'); var s = document.createElement('script'); s.setAttribute('src', 'https://assets.revcontent.com/master/delivery.js'); document.body.appendChild(s); window.removeEventListener('scroll', throttledRevContent); __tnt.log('Load Rev Content'); } } }, 100); window.addEventListener('scroll', throttledRevContent); }

Be the first to know

Get local news delivered to your inbox!

Wolf pack that attacked Colorado livestock to be relocated as reintroduction program stumbles (2024)

FAQs

Wolf pack that attacked Colorado livestock to be relocated as reintroduction program stumbles? ›

Wildlife agencies are trying to capture and relocate the first pack of wolves that formed under Colorado's ambitious wolf reintroduction

wolf reintroduction
Wolf reintroduction involves the reintroduction of a portion of grey wolves in areas where native wolves have been extirpated. More than 30 subspecies of Canis lupus have been recognized, and grey wolves, as colloquially understood, comprise nondomestic/feral subspecies.
https://en.wikipedia.org
program after the animals repeatedly attacked livestock, marking an early stumble in the voter-driven initiative.

Why is it bad to reintroduce wolves to Colorado? ›

Scientists there fear a Colorado gray wolf introduction “threatens the genetic integrity and recovery of the subspecies.” Translation: the genetic extinction of the Mexican wolf is a very real possibility.

What is the wolf reintroduction program trying to accomplish? ›

Since 1995, when wolves were reintroduced to the American West, research has shown that in many places they have helped revitalize and restore ecosystems. They improve habitat and increase populations of countless species from birds of prey to pronghorn, and even trout.

When did they reintroduce wolves to Colorado? ›

Wolves in Colorado

Ten wolves were reintroduced to the state in December, 2023 as part of this plan.

What was the wolf reintroduction conflict? ›

After many years of research, debate, and compromise there are several resolutions to this conflict: the economics of recovery, compensation for loss of livestock, wolf depredation of livestock on public land, and the removal of wolves if they killed livestock on private land.

Is reintroducing wolves bad? ›

Perceived positive impacts of wolf reintroduction mentioned by 2019 survey respondents include the ability of wolves to restore balance to ecosystems and improve the natural environment; the opportunity to view wolves in the wild; emotional and cultural connections to wolves; enhanced tourism opportunities; a reduction ...

Do we really need wolves? ›

While they may affect abundance in some species, wolves can also play an important role in the environment. In ungulate herds that have not been exposed to wolves for a time, this can increase the proportion of healthy animals of prime age, leading to higher pregnancy and birth rates.

What are the main arguments for wolf reintroduction? ›

Moral arguments for wolf reintroduction include: wolves deserve to live where they once thrived, humans should share the land with and respect members of the biotic community such as wolves, and wolves enhance the wilderness character of natural areas.

What disadvantages result from reintroduction of the wolves? ›

Negative effects of reintroduction:

Depredation and harassment of livestock, herd dogs, and guard dogs. Loss of pets and hobby animals.

What was the most unexpected result of the wolves reintroduction? ›

Wolf reintroduction caused unanticipated change in Yellowstone. It rebalanced elk and deer populations, allowing the willows and aspen to return to the landscape. The end to overgrazing stabilized riverbanks and rivers recovered and flowed in new directions.

How many wolves are in Colorado in 2024? ›

Colorado is home to 11 adult wolves, nine of which the state released in December as part of a voter-mandated reintroduction plan. The other two are the remnants of a pack formed by wolves that migrated from Wyoming. Two of the reintroduced wolves mated and CPW last week confirmed the birth of at least one pup.

How many wolves can Colorado support? ›

– Colorado Gov.

The agency's reintroduction plan, finalized earlier this year, calls for the release of 10 to 15 wolves per year over the next three to five years, with an initial target of a stable population of at least 50 animals within the state.

Why did Colorado get rid of wolves? ›

The decision to remove the wolves from the area comes after Colorado Parks & Wildlife denied a request from a local rancher to take lethal action to protect his livestock. And it comes only about nine months after 10 wolves were brought to Colorado from Oregon and released by wildlife biologists.

What states are reintroducing wolves? ›

Recovering populations exist in Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, Washington and Oregon, with a few wolves beginning to range into California.

Who might oppose wolf reintroduction? ›

Ranchers and hunters frequently oppose wolf reintroduction initiatives because they are worried about wolves preying on their cattle and game animals.

Why is the wolf reintroduction project so controversial in the Rockies? ›

The reintroduction has been lauded by conservationists but criticized by ranchers and people in rural communities, who say the wolves pose a risk to livestock, wildlife and pets.

Wildlife officials release 5 wolves from Oregon ...Rocky Mountain PBShttps://www.rmpbs.org ›

Monday, Dec. 17 was the first time a state — not the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service — had introduced an endangered species into wildland in the United States.
The decision keeps Colorado on track to release wolves on the Western Slope by the end of the year, meeting requirements laid out in a ballot initiative narrowl...
On Monday, Colorado Parks and Wildlife released five gray wolves in Grand County. The move follows a ballot initiative that narrowly passed in a statewide elect...

What is the controversy with the wolves in Colorado? ›

Colorado's controversial plan has received widespread opposition from farmers and ranchers, who consider wolves a dangerous threat to wildlife and livestock. Several other states also refused to supply Colorado with wolves, citing concerns over wolf population growth and wolves crossing state borders.

What is a disadvantage of reintroducing wolves to Yellowstone? ›

One potential disadvantage of reintroducing wolves to Yellowstone is an increase in livestock depredation. Wolves, being keystone species, play a pivotal role in their ecosystem and their presence can lead to significant ecological changes.

Was it a good idea to reintroduce wolves to Yellowstone? ›

The Effects of the Reintroduction of Wolves

In the years that followed, wolves brought the elk population down and protected the open valleys from overgrazing.

Why were the coyotes negatively affected when the wolves were reintroduced? ›

There appears to be a trade-off in which wolf kills provide a quick source of food that is energetically advantageous to coyotes; however, attendant costs included increased vigilance, decreased rest, and a higher risk of being killed.

References

Top Articles
Juicy and Flavorful Marinated Burgers recipe - Saving Room for Dessert
75 Elegant Christmas Appetizer Recipes That'll Wow Party Guests
Tyrones Unblocked Games Basketball Stars
Www.citizen-Times.com Obituaries
Erste Schritte für deine Flipboard Magazine — Ein Blogger-Guide -
Superhot Unblocked Games
Unveiling The Voice Behind Maui: The Actor Behind The Demigod
3rd Gen Acura TL Buyers’ Guide – Everything You Need to Know – Newparts.com
Pa Pdmp Log In
9:00 A.m. Cdt
M&T Bank Atm Locations Near Me
Stanley Steemer Medford Oregon
Espn Masters Leaderboard
Chase Bank Time Hours
DRAGON BALL Z - Goku Evolution - Light Canvas 40X3 NEU • EUR 37,63
Bones And All Showtimes Near Tucson Spectrum 18
라이키 유출
Onlybaddiestv
Sloansmoans Bio
Chula Vista Tv Listings
Craigslist Columbus Ohio Craigslist
Ticket To Paradise Showtimes Near Movie Tavern Bedford
Thermal Pants Mens Walmart
Idaho Falls Temple Prayer Roll
1970 Baltimore Orioles World Series Scroll Pennant
My Fico Forums
Craigslist Used Motorhomes For Sale By Owner
Panty Note Manga Online
Locals Canna House Deals
Stanley Steemer Medford Oregon
Deshaun Watson Stats, News and Video - QB | NFL.com
What Happened To Doublelist? Unveiling The Mystery | Men's Venture
Amarillos (FRIED SWEET PLANTAINS) Recipe – Taste Of Cochin
Februarycash2023
Emily Dealy Obituary
Sce Menifee Service Center
Mission Impossible 7 Showtimes Near Regal Willoughby Commons
Sallisaw Bin Store
Terraria Cement Mixer
Mvsu Canvas
Craigslist In Visalia California
Vegan Eggplant Parmesan
Tighe Hamilton Hudson Ma Obituary
Vcu Basketball Wiki
Luaj Shah Falas
Dl 9672
Mt Sinai Walk In Clinic
New Application Instructions · Government Portal
3220 Nevada Terrace Ottawa Ks 66067
Kernersville pastor arrested after police find weapons, body armor and fentanyl in his Las Vegas Hotel room
South Florida residents must earn more than $100,000 to avoid being 'rent burdened'
The Ultimate Guide to Newquay Surf - Surf Atlas
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Gov. Deandrea McKenzie

Last Updated:

Views: 6277

Rating: 4.6 / 5 (66 voted)

Reviews: 89% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Gov. Deandrea McKenzie

Birthday: 2001-01-17

Address: Suite 769 2454 Marsha Coves, Debbieton, MS 95002

Phone: +813077629322

Job: Real-Estate Executive

Hobby: Archery, Metal detecting, Kitesurfing, Genealogy, Kitesurfing, Calligraphy, Roller skating

Introduction: My name is Gov. Deandrea McKenzie, I am a spotless, clean, glamorous, sparkling, adventurous, nice, brainy person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.